<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1.4x II TC versus Kenko 1.4x DG 300 Pro TC comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://camerablognetwork.com/2008/06/canon-14x-ii-tc-versus-kenko-14x-dg-300-pro-tc-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://camerablognetwork.com/2008/06/canon-14x-ii-tc-versus-kenko-14x-dg-300-pro-tc-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gip</title>
		<link>http://camerablognetwork.com/2008/06/canon-14x-ii-tc-versus-kenko-14x-dg-300-pro-tc-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>Gip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.camerablognetwork.com/?p=81#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>Hey, interesting post.

I just went from the ef 70-300is to the ef 100-400Lis. The Kenko I used on the 70-300 with good (I hope) results.. Check it on my web site. 

I will test this kenko with my new 100-400. Did a few test shots (2 pins taped) already and it seem to focus fine. The 100-400 is an October 2009 model. And I use it on a monopod with DIY Gimbal head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, interesting post.</p>
<p>I just went from the ef 70-300is to the ef 100-400Lis. The Kenko I used on the 70-300 with good (I hope) results.. Check it on my web site. </p>
<p>I will test this kenko with my new 100-400. Did a few test shots (2 pins taped) already and it seem to focus fine. The 100-400 is an October 2009 model. And I use it on a monopod with DIY Gimbal head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
